Shakespeare’s Comedic Style

Shakespeare’s comedies end in marriages, reconciliations, and restored harmony — and it is worth asking what they put their characters through to get there.

What Comedy Meant to Shakespeare

In the theatrical tradition Shakespeare inherited, comedy was defined formally rather than tonally: a comedy was a play that ended well, with society reconstituted and order restored, usually through marriage. Tragedy ended in death and dissolution. This formal distinction allowed comedy to contain material that was not particularly funny — threat, deception, humiliation, genuine anguish — provided it resolved correctly. Shakespeare uses this latitude extensively.

His comedies are not simply pleasant entertainments. They are plays that consistently subject their characters to disorienting experiences — sustained disguise, complete loss of identity, systematic deception, enforced public humiliation — and then resolve these experiences through endings that the preceding action has made complicated. The marriages that close Twelfth Night, Much Ado About Nothing, and As You Like It are formally satisfying, but the plays have done enough to make us aware that satisfaction is the shape the ending takes, not necessarily the full story of what has happened.

Understanding Shakespeare’s comedic style means understanding both the formal conventions he used and what he did to complicate them.

Disguise and the Instability of Identity

Disguise is the central mechanism of Shakespearean comedy, and Shakespeare uses it more persistently and more seriously than any of his contemporaries. In Twelfth Night, Viola disguises herself as Cesario and becomes the object of Olivia’s love and Orsino’s affection simultaneously — a configuration that cannot resolve until the disguise is removed, and even then requires the convenient appearance of Sebastian to work the knots out. In As You Like It, Rosalind disguises herself as Ganymede and then, in the forest, plays “Rosalind” for Orlando — performing her own identity as a theatrical exercise for a man who loves her but cannot see through her. In The Merchant of Venice, Portia disguises herself as a lawyer and conducts the trial that saves her husband’s friend.

What makes these disguise plots more than simple mechanism is what they reveal about identity. Viola as Cesario is described by Olivia and Orsino in terms that suggest they are responding to something real — not just to the surface of a disguise but to qualities in Viola that the disguise releases rather than conceals. The ambiguity of “Cesario” allows the characters around her to feel things they might not feel toward “Viola.” The disguise is not purely an obstruction to recognition; it is, paradoxically, a condition that allows certain truths to be visible.

The plays that use women disguised as men — Twelfth Night, As You Like It, The Merchant of Venice, The Two Gentlemen of Verona, Cymbeline — also exploit the specific conditions of Elizabethan theatre, where women’s roles were played by boys. The boy actor playing Rosalind disguised as a boy playing Rosalind for Orlando collapses the theatrical frame in ways that Shakespeare clearly found interesting.

Wit Combat

The comedies’ most immediately pleasurable element is the wit combat — the rapid exchange of puns, paradoxes, and verbal reversals between characters who are evenly matched in intelligence and mutually attracted without being willing to admit it. Benedick and Beatrice in Much Ado About Nothing are the fullest development of this mode, but it appears in some form in almost every comedy.

What makes wit combat more than decoration is its psychological function. Benedick and Beatrice are defending themselves against vulnerability with language — the jokes are a way of being close to someone without acknowledging the closeness, of being interested in someone without committing to the interest. “I had rather hear my dog bark at a crow than a man swear he loves me” — Beatrice says this while being unable to stop talking about Benedick. The wit is the avoidance mechanism, and the comedy of the play is partly the progressive exposure of what the wit is defending against.

The wit also does social work. In a world where women have very limited control over their circumstances, verbal facility is one of the few forms of power available to them. Beatrice’s wit is not merely charming; it is her primary resource for maintaining some form of agency in a world that is persistently trying to arrange her life for her.

Malvolio and the Limits of Comedy

The most searching test of what Shakespeare’s comedy actually does is Twelfth Night‘s treatment of Malvolio. He is pompous, self-important, and genuinely unpleasant to the people around him — but the trick played on him, which involves forging a letter in Olivia’s handwriting to convince him she is in love with him, engineering his public humiliation, and then imprisoning him in darkness while Feste torments him as “Sir Topas,” goes considerably beyond anything his pomposity deserves.

At the end of the play, Malvolio is released and given the forged letter as evidence of what was done to him. He leaves saying “I’ll be revenged on the whole pack of you” — and then the play ends. Orsino says they should “pursue him and entreat him to a peace,” but Malvolio is not there and does not return. The comic resolution closes around his absence. He is the element the ending cannot contain.

Shakespeare has made this character unpleasant enough that his humiliation is funny — and then made the humiliation severe enough that the laughter becomes uncomfortable. The play ends with all the conventional signals of comic resolution (marriages, reconciliations, revelations of identity) while leaving one character out in the cold. This is not an accident. It is Shakespeare testing the edges of what comedy can accommodate.

The Problem Plays

Between roughly 1601 and 1604, Shakespeare wrote a group of comedies — All’s Well That Ends Well, Measure for Measure, and Troilus and Cressida — that use all the formal conventions of comedy while making it almost impossible to feel the expected emotional satisfaction at the end. Scholars call them “problem plays” or “dark comedies,” and the problem they pose is that the resolutions feel inadequate to what has preceded them.

In Measure for Measure, the Duke has engineered a plot of sustained deception to bring the villain Angelo to justice — including the “bed trick,” in which Mariana substitutes for Isabella in Angelo’s bed — and the ending, in which Angelo is forgiven and the Duke proposes marriage to Isabella, works formally as comedy but feels deeply strange. Isabella does not respond to the Duke’s proposal. The play’s last words are his; she has no lines after his offer. Whether she accepts is left open, and the silence is the play’s most uncomfortable moment.

All’s Well That Ends Well ends with Bertram accepting Helena as his wife after she has tricked him into fathering her child — his acceptance is conditional and barely enthusiastic, and the play’s closing couplet (“All yet seems well, and if it end so meet, / The bitter past, more welcome is the sweet”) draws attention to its own uncertainty. “Seems well” is not the same as “is well.” The problem play is Shakespeare using comedy’s formal ending to examine what endings actually resolve.

The Comedies of the Late Period

The late romances — The Winter’s Tale, The Tempest, Cymbeline, Pericles — are classified separately from the comedies but belong to the same formal tradition of plays that end with reconciliation and restoration. They are distinguished by their embrace of the apparently impossible: the statue that comes to life, the island where magic works, the recognition scenes after sixteen years of separation.

The Winter’s Tale is the most extreme case. Leontes destroys his family through paranoid jealousy — his wife apparently dies, his infant daughter is abandoned, his son dies of grief — and the play then skips sixteen years and presents a miraculous restoration. Hermione, revealed to be alive, comes back to Leontes as a statue that moves. The restoration is not earned in any realistic sense; it is given as a kind of grace, and the play is fully aware that this is what it is doing. Perdita (the abandoned daughter, now found) is restored to her parents; Hermione is restored to Leontes; but Mamillius, the dead son, is not. The losses are not cancelled. The restoration happens alongside them.

This is where Shakespeare’s comedic thinking ends up — in plays that use formal resolution to explore what cannot be resolved, that use the structure of happiness to examine what happiness costs and what it leaves out.

How the Comedies Are Organised

Across the full range of comedies, several patterns recur: the movement from a restrictive social world into a freer space (the forest of Arden, Prospero’s island, the woods outside Athens) where the normal rules are suspended; the return from that space to the social world, transformed; the multiple plots running simultaneously at different social levels, with the lower plots commenting ironically on the upper ones; and the ending in which the social order is reconstituted on a slightly different basis than before.

These structures are not formulaic repetitions. Each play uses them differently, and each play’s relationship to the expected resolution is different. A Midsummer Night’s Dream uses the forest world to explore the arbitrariness of desire — Titania falls in love with Bottom, the lovers’ affections are reassigned by fairy magic — and the ending sends everyone back to Athens having experienced something they cannot quite account for. Puck’s epilogue offers to explain it all as a dream, which is either reassurance or the play’s most unsettling gesture.

The comedies are studies in what social forms — marriage, community, order — can and cannot contain. Shakespeare never loses sight of what they cannot contain, even while he stages the forms themselves.

Share This Page